Logomachon






Clearing the Fog
in the
War of Words

 

   
  logomachy--1. A dispute about words. 2. A dispute carried on in words only; a battle of words.
logomachon--1. One who argues about words. 2. A word warrior.

   
   
   
 

2004-10-16
 

Piece of My Heart

This post is a bit personal. Maybe the parts don’t have any connection, except that they happened to me.
Richard Kerry, John Kerry's father, was a disgruntled career State Department counsel. In 1990 he published his summa, The Star-Spangled Mirror. It has recently been republished with an extended subtitle: The Star-Spangled Mirror: A Father's Legacy Shapes John Kerry's Worldview.

Here is how the publisher describes Richard Kerry's view of proper US foreign policy:
The Star-Spangled Mirror captures the dilemma of America's continuing reliance on an enduring fallacy of foreign policy--the assumption that other people ought to share our view of world order. Dr. Richard Kerry argues that from the time of Woodrow Wilson's aim to organize the world order in accordance with assumptions of democratic universalism, this vision of the world has remained central to U.S. foreign policy. The Star-Spangled Mirror will be considered an important addition to the history of American foreign policy and as required reading for current and future policy makers.[emphasis added--ed.]
John Kerry's application of this principle has been brutal. He often cloaks his positions in the mantle of respect for the nuances of cultural differences. In practice, eschewing the "enduring fallacy" of "democratic universalism" has meant supporting tyranny and opposing liberation on every occasion.

In the case of Vietnam, he dismissed the idea that the Vietnamese people wanted or deserved freedom, and that the US was fighting to make it possible.

President Nixon said of Vietnam, “. . . the question is whether or not we will leave that country to the Communists or whether or not we will try to give it hope to be a free people”. To which Kerry replied with fine irrelevance: “But the point is they are not a free people now under us. They are not a free people, and we cannot fight Communism all over the World, and I think we should have learned that lesson by now.”

He was wrong about that, but he’s never unlearned the lesson.

And again: “We found most people didn't even know the difference between communism and democracy. . . . They practiced the art of survival by siding with whichever military force was present at a particular time, be it Vietcong, North Vietnamese, or American.”

And “to attempt to justify the loss of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom . . . is to us the height of criminal hypocrisy.”

That would have been the post, but while I was working on it, I went to the Haverford Public Library, where I saw a table with Douglas Brinkley's biography of John Kerry, Tour of Duty, on a display stand. Lying about on the table were a dozen other books about the Vietnam War. I picked up one I knew about but hadn’t looked at, Piece of My Heart: The Stories of 26 American Women who Served in Vietnam, and started flipping through it. My eye fell on a story by Lily Jean Lee Adams, who was an Army nurse in Cu Chi in 1968 on p.320.

Shortly after arriving in Vietnam, Adams was assigned to care for a seriously ill North Vietnamese POW. She hadn’t come to Vietnam to “take care of gooks”, but the man was believed to have important information that could save American lives. After a shift of constantly monitoring and adjusting the young man’s medication, she had become attached to her patient, and when the interrogators arrived, she was thinking “If they start slapping him around, I’m going to start slapping them around, because I worked my ass off to keep this kid alive”.

After listening to the interrogation, she got to ask the prisoner/patient a question.
I said, “He doesn’t have to answer if he doesn’t want to, but I’d like to know how he feels about the war.” The interpretation was—and he looked straight at me when he said it—“If I could march in Hanoi like you are marching in Washington, D.C., I would be doing it”.
That hit me. I had to walk to a quiet part of the library to compose myself. For the first time, I nearly hated John Kerry and all the rest of the smug, posturing, strident, over-bearing, self-righteous, pious, pompous “anti-war” movement. While John Kerry sanctimoniously indicted America for being racist, even as he dismissed the Vietnamese for being indifferent to liberty, a 19-year-old North Vietnamese soldier was showing more brilliance of spirit and respect for freedom—American freedom—than John Kerry has ever had in his bleak and blasted life.

|
 

Secret Angel Man

Useful Fools points out this nonsense, reported on Yahoo:
NEW YORK (AFP) - Human Rights Watch listed the names of 11 senior Al-Qaeda suspects it said were held by the CIA in secret locations overseas, where some had reportedly been tortured.

The suspects were detained with no notification to their families, no Red Cross access and, in some cases, no acknowledgement that they are even being held, the New York-based watchdog said in a 46-page report.

"'Disappearances' were a trademark abuse of Latin American military dictatorships in their 'dirty war' on alleged subversion," said Human Rights Watch special counsel Reed Brody.

"Now they have become a United States tactic in its conflict with Al-Qaeda," Brody said.

Detainees profiled in the report included Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the alleged principal architect of the September 11, 2001 attacks and Abu Zubayda, reputedly a close aide of Osama bin Laden.
...
While recognizing the United States' right to gather anti-terror intelligence, Human Rights Watch argued that the secret incommunicado detention of suspects violated the "most basic principles" of a free society.

As I commented in Useful Fools, notice the misplaced "alleged". There was no question of the subversion in Latin America; it was its perpetrators who were alleged. Notice also the distortions necessary to create an appearance of equivalence:
  • Equating citizen political prisoners with international terrorists
  • Implying that international terrorists are due the same treatment as lawful soldiers. If nothing else, a POW is out of it, while in contrast, the very fact of a clandestine agent's capture is a valuable--even life-saving--piece of information. Security concerns might make a trial impossible.
  • Asserting that the capture and imprisonment of non-US citizens in foreign countries by foreign governments makes the CIA guilty of illegal restraint and murder of US citizens at home.
  • Implying the absurdity that a clandestine terrorist can be (further) "disappeared".
  • Counting acknowledged prisoners among the "disappeared".
  • It would be easy to ask where HRW has been during kidnappings, beheadings, and bombings conducted by the NGO mujihadin, but they don't even acknowledge that they have no idea of where to deliver the letter of protest, and that includes a press conference for the Arab/Islamic press (predicted attendance: 0).
There are at least two things about NGOs like Human Rights Watch that really grate my goolies:
First, they are completely irresponsible and unaccountable. They are simply facilitators for moral posturing by people whose annual dues are solicited by trumped up simplistic morality tales.

Second, they assume an inhuman, angelic viewpoint that goes far beyond any national or international law, and they act as though every government action is covered by their nicey-nicey punctilio appropriate for dealing with Enron executives (tho no liberal worth his ACLU card wouldn't give up one of his Volvos for a chance to violate the Geneva Conventions with Ken Lay). The word for this is arrogance.

But that is an interesting concept. Suppose the Director of Central Intelligence had an angelic advisor. Would the advisor have his feathers all in a flutter over a couple of al-Qa'eda honchos kept under wraps? Here's the official prayer: "St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. Be our protector against the wickedness and snares of the devil . . . Thrust into hell Satan and all evil spirits, who wander through the world seeking the ruin and destruction of souls." Does that sound like a Human Rights Watch brief? Not to me.

Now, thrusting into Hell is not in the CIA’s job description, so St. Michael would certainly insist on positive identification, three squares and a rack, toothbrush, towel, blanket, and shower every other day. I trust our spooks would restrain some of our less refined allies.

Note: This concept is copyright 2004 by Logomachon, as are the show titles,
"C I Angel", "Angel: CIA", and "Touched by an Angel: CIA, Afghanistan". Ditto for the song title, "Secret ANGEL Man". Note also that I will do everything humanly possible to prevent the production of such a show, but if I fail, I want producer's points.
|

 

   
  This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.
My Profile

Socialism Is Un-American

Republicans under the bed

Should Bush's chickens come home to roost or to cr...

Obama CAN'T Be a Socialist

Conservatives shouldn't buy into liberals' ideas o...

Biden impugns Liberal-Fascists' patriotism

Death spiral for Socialist "health-care reform"

Martha Coakley the witch hunter

Thanksgiving double dactyl

The Vile Legacy of Ted Kennedy

2004-02-22
2004-02-29
2004-03-07
2004-03-14
2004-03-21
2004-03-28
2004-04-18
2004-04-25
2004-05-02
2004-05-16
2004-06-27
2004-07-25
2004-08-01
2004-08-08
2004-08-15
2004-08-22
2004-08-29
2004-09-05
2004-09-12
2004-09-19
2004-09-26
2004-10-03
2004-10-10
2004-10-17
2004-10-24
2004-10-31
2004-11-07
2004-11-14
2004-11-21
2004-11-28
2004-12-05
2004-12-12
2004-12-19
2004-12-26
2005-01-02
2005-01-09
2005-01-16
2005-02-13
2005-03-20
2005-04-03
2005-04-17
2005-05-15
2005-05-29
2005-06-12
2005-06-19
2005-07-31
2005-11-27
2006-01-15
2006-01-29
2006-02-05
2006-02-12
2006-03-05
2006-04-09
2006-04-30
2006-05-28
2006-06-11
2006-06-25
2009-08-16
2009-08-23
2009-11-29
2009-12-06
2009-12-13
2010-01-24
2010-04-25
2011-01-30
2011-08-14
  • Current Posts

  • Home  |  Archives